Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:14:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:14:32 -0500 Received: from delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl ([213.192.72.1]:40601 "EHLO delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:14:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:12:04 +0100 (MET) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Petr Vandrovec cc: Alan Cox , Chris Wedgwood , swsnyder@home.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: "APIC error on CPUx" - what does this mean? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Technical University of Gdansk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > No. It is fully-VIA motherboard (Asus A7V), VIA KT133 as a northbridge > and VIA686A as a southbridge, with 1GHz Athlon. And spurious IRQ happen > when either of (massive) IRQ sources (Promise UDMA, tulip-based network > card, an es137x soundcard) emits interrupts. A possible reason is the 8259A in the chipset deasserts its INT output late enough for the Athlon CPU's local APIC to register another ExtINTA interrupt sometimes, possibly under specific circumstances. If that's true, either the chipset or the APIC (or both) is at fault for not meeting the specs. It causes no system stability problem but there is a performance hit due to these spurious interrupts. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/