Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933481AbYBMQ5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:57:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759292AbYBMQ5c (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:57:32 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:46031 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757690AbYBMQ5b (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:57:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:36:48 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Dhaval Giani Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , lkml Subject: Re: Regression in latest sched-git Message-ID: <20080213170648.GA28410@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20080212185355.GA6320@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1202845208.6247.82.camel@lappy> <20080213030035.GA3402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1202907078.20209.3.camel@lappy> <20080213163444.GA19570@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080213163444.GA19570@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 588 Lines: 16 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:04:44PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote: > I know I am missing something, but aren't we trying to reduce latencies > here? I guess Peter is referring to the latency in seeing fairness results. In other words, with single rq approach, you may require more time for the groups to converge on fairness. -- Regards, vatsa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/