Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932753AbYBMRYi (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:24:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760708AbYBMRY2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:24:28 -0500 Received: from smtp6.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.40]:38996 "EHLO smtp6.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759210AbYBMRY0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:24:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:24:11 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Greg KH Cc: Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , Jeff Garzik , David Miller , arjan@infradead.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) Message-ID: <20080213172411.GA14269@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080212044314.GA4888@kroah.com> <20080211211751.3e265754@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080211.221126.230471463.davem@davemloft.net> <47B1CB08.4020101@garzik.org> <20080212174824.GA1919@kroah.com> <20080212191552.GA20883@kroah.com> <20080212194651.GI27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080212205051.GB21650@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080212205051.GB21650@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1253 Lines: 36 On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:46:51PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: >... > > AFAICS, we are in situation when review bandwidth is where the bottleneck > > is. Not the merge one... > > Are there still large numbers of posted patches, not reviewed or picked > up by anyone laying around somewhere? I thought Andrew-the-patch-vacuum > had been doing a great job of keeping that from happening lately. I wrote in one of the many bug reports I sent for compile errors introduced in Linus' tree during this merge window: An architecture specific patch that breaks the one architecture it touches at the first file being compiled is even for kernel standards unusually bad... > thanks, > > greg k-h cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/