Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:47:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:47:34 -0500 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:29412 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:47:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:51:40 +0100 From: "J.A. Magallon" To: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?Q?N=FCtzel?= Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Andrea Arcangeli , Rik van Riel , Linux Kernel List , Andrew Morton , Robert Love Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Message-ID: <20020108145140.A4250@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <20020108030420Z287595-13997+1799@vger.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20020108030420Z287595-13997+1799@vger.kernel.org>; from Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de on Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:02:44 +0100 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.3.0 Lines: 21 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20020108 Dieter N?tzel wrote: >Is it possible to decide, now what should go into 2.4.18 (maybe -pre3) -aa or >-rmap? >Andrew Morten`s read-latency.patch is a clear winner for me, too. >What about 00_nanosleep-5 and bootmem? >The O(1) scheduler? >Maybe preemption? It is disengageable so nobody should be harmed but we get >the chance for wider testing. > >Any comments? > I would pefer the ton of small, usefull and safe bits in Andrea's kernel (vm-21, cache-aligned-spinlocks, compiler, gcc3, rwsem, highmen fixes...) -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.18-pre2-beo #1 SMP Tue Jan 8 03:18:18 CET 2002 i686 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/