Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:01:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:01:07 -0500 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.14.212]:60422 "EHLO winder.codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:00:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:00:45 -0700 From: Erik Andersen To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hardware Inventory [was: Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?] Message-ID: <20020108140044.GA26621@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.16-rmk1, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel StrongARM 110 rev 3), 185.95 BogoMips X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue Jan 08, 2002 at 02:00:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > That's not half a bad idea. If we want a _maintained_ libc for the kernel, > > having it maintained by kernel folks may make sense. There's nothing > > stopping us borrowing bits from dietlibc and friends after all. > > Why not _work_ with the dietlibc people instead of creating the fifth or > sixth small libc project ? And/or the uClibc people.... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/