Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:56:53 -0500
From: "Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@coraid.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 aoedev_isbusy()
Message-ID: <20080213225653.GK4355@coraid.com>
References: <20080213213002.GT3383@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802132303150.29154@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <20080213220537.GA24319@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080213220537.GA24319@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1000
Lines: 27

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:05:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:03:35PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > 
> > On Feb 13 2008 23:30, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > >This patch #if 0's the no longer used aoedev_isbusy().
> > 
> > Why not just remove it? (It can be resurrected from earlier
> > revisions should it be needed again.)
> 
> I've switched to doing #if 0 instead since this addresses the
> "It might be needed in the future." answer I otherwise sometimes
> got.
> 
> But if a maintainer wants to have such a function deleted instead that's 
> fine with me.

Hello.  That function can go away.  I have some changes pending, but
none of them use aoedev_isbusy.  Thanks for Cc-ing me.

-- 
  Ed L Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/