Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:38:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:38:32 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:36882 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:38:20 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br (Marcelo Tosatti) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:46:20 +0000 (GMT) Cc: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de (Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?=), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel List), akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), rml@tech9.net (Robert Love) In-Reply-To: from "Marcelo Tosatti" at Jan 08, 2002 11:59:36 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Andrew Morten`s read-latency.patch is a clear winner for me, too. > > AFAIK Andrew's code simply adds schedule points around the kernel, righ= > t?=20 > > If so, nope, I do not plan to integrate it. Yep. It has the most wonderful effect on system latency without actually breaking any semantics. Pre-empt is a trickier one because it does change actual behaviour a lot more, although it should be preserving locking rules. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/