Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759440AbYBNQEs (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:04:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755326AbYBNQDt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:03:49 -0500 Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:15536 "EHLO viefep14-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754891AbYBNQDs (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:03:48 -0500 Message-Id: <20080214155724.772744000@chello.nl> User-Agent: quilt/0.45-1 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:57:24 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Dhaval Giani , Paul Jackson , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Gregory Haskins Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] reworking load_balance_monitor Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 687 Lines: 18 Hi, Here the current patches that rework load_balance_monitor. The main reason for doing this is to eliminate the wakeups the thing generates, esp. on an idle system. The bonus is that it removes a kernel thread. Paul, Gregory - the thing that bothers me most atm is the lack of rd->load_balance. Should I introduce that (-rt ought to make use of that as well) by way of copying from the top sched_domain when it gets created? - peterz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/