Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765655AbYBNTqu (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:46:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765529AbYBNTqd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:46:33 -0500 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:60346 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762435AbYBNTqc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:46:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:46:33 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Roland McGrath , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] samples: build fix Message-ID: <20080214194633.GA21894@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080214034541.EF1BD270192@magilla.localdomain> <20080214132752.GA27478@Krystal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080214132752.GA27478@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1746 Lines: 40 On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:27:52AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Roland McGrath (roland@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules. > > But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux. > > I can't see why this was ever done in this nonstandard fashion. > > As things stand, the modules don't get built by 'make modules'. > > > > I didn't make the addition of the directory use core-$(CONFIG_SAMPLES) > > because there is no other conditional like that in the top-level Makefile > > and samples/Makefile already uses obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLES) as if it expects > > always to be included. > > > > Sam, is this ok with the samples intent ? I think as long as we do not > include them with the kernel image and have a "make samples" to build > them, it's ok. Having them built upon make modules seems like a good > idea to me. The samples code are supposed to be what the name says 'samples'. This is not code that are supposed to be part of the built-in kernel. This is not modules that are supposed to be installes when installing modules. Adding it to core-y as Roland does in the patch below is plain wrong as it enabled both points above. The fact that the present code in samples/ does not do this is in this respect irellevant. Do we have problems when to build the sampls - then lets address this issue but not by trying to upgrade the samples to first class citizen in the kernel - they are not that and should not be handled like that. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/