Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932143AbYBOGeT (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:34:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754305AbYBOGeE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:34:04 -0500 Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92]:36755 "EHLO fmsmga102.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750927AbYBOGeD (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:34:03 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,356,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="298708347" Subject: Re: tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1 From: "Zhang, Yanmin" To: Eric Dumazet Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <47B52B95.3070607@cosmosbay.com> References: <1203040321.3027.131.camel@ymzhang> <47B52B95.3070607@cosmosbay.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:30:44 +0800 Message-Id: <1203057044.3027.134.camel@ymzhang> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.2 (2.9.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2054 Lines: 54 On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 07:05 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Zhang, Yanmin a ?crit : > > Comparing with kernel 2.6.24, tbench result has regression with > > 2.6.25-rc1. > > > > 1) On 2 quad-core processor stoakley: 4%. > > 2) On 4 quad-core processor tigerton: more than 30%. > > > > bisect located below patch. > > > > b4ce92775c2e7ff9cf79cca4e0a19c8c5fd6287b is first bad commit > > commit b4ce92775c2e7ff9cf79cca4e0a19c8c5fd6287b > > Author: Herbert Xu > > Date: Tue Nov 13 21:33:32 2007 -0800 > > > > [IPV6]: Move nfheader_len into rt6_info > > > > The dst member nfheader_len is only used by IPv6. It's also currently > > creating a rather ugly alignment hole in struct dst. Therefore this patch > > moves it from there into struct rt6_info. > > > > > > As tbench uses ipv4, so the patch's real impact on ipv4 is it deletes > > nfheader_len in dst_entry. It might change cache line alignment. > > > > To verify my finding, I just added nfheader_len back to dst_entry in 2.6.25-rc1 > > and reran tbench on the 2 machines. Performance could be recovered completely. > > > > I started cpu_number*2 tbench processes. On my 16-core tigerton: > > #./tbench_srv & > > #./tbench 32 127.0.0.1 > > > > -yanmin > > Yup. struct dst is sensitive to alignements, especially for benches. > > In the real world, we need to make sure that next pointer start at a cache > line bondary (or a litle bit after), so that RT cache lookups use one cache > line per entry instead of two. This permits better behavior in DDOS attacks. > > (check commit 1e19e02ca0c5e33ea73a25127dbe6c3b8fcaac4b for reference) > > Are you using a 64 or a 32 bit kernel ? 64bit x86-64 machine. On another 4-way Madison Itanium machine, tbench has the similiar regression. -yanmin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/