Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:38:44 +0100
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shannon.nelson@intel.com, olof@lixom.net,
       yur@emcraft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] async_tx: fix dependency handling and related
 cleanups
Message-ID: <20080215093844.61917039@dhcp-252-066.norway.atmel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080213065944.793.23537.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
References: <20080213065944.793.23537.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
Organization: Atmel Norway
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 758
Lines: 19

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:02:52 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> Dan Williams (4):
>       iop-adma: remove the workaround for missed interrupts on iop3xx
>       async_tx: kill ->device_dependency_added
>       async_tx: fix multiple dependency submission
>       async_tx: checkpatch says s/__FUNCTION__/__func__/g

All of the above changes are fine with me. I'll rebase my dmaslave
patches on top of them; that will probably allow me to get rid of the
dma_slave_descriptor struct.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/