Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933635AbYBOKAk (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:00:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764164AbYBOKAZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:00:25 -0500 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:41491 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761838AbYBOKAX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:00:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:00:21 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: David Rientjes Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, clameter@sgi.com, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag Message-Id: <20080215040021.31e22cf4.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20080214040918.d735e920.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 646 Lines: 17 > like MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES or whatever Paul decides to call it MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES it is. I see no compelling need for this name to track whatever we name the relative bitmap operator. They are related, but not the same thing. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/