Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761752AbYBOOWh (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:22:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934729AbYBOOV6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:21:58 -0500 Received: from smtp25.orange.fr ([193.252.22.22]:15086 "EHLO smtp25.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934704AbYBOOVz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:21:55 -0500 X-ME-UUID: 20080215142152928.E29A01C0008C@mwinf2526.orange.fr Message-ID: <47B59FFC.4030603@cosmosbay.com> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:21:48 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zhang, Yanmin" Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1 References: <1203040321.3027.131.camel@ymzhang> <47B52B95.3070607@cosmosbay.com> <1203057044.3027.134.camel@ymzhang> In-Reply-To: <1203057044.3027.134.camel@ymzhang> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3044 Lines: 93 Zhang, Yanmin a écrit : > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 07:05 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> Zhang, Yanmin a �crit : >> >>> Comparing with kernel 2.6.24, tbench result has regression with >>> 2.6.25-rc1. >>> >>> 1) On 2 quad-core processor stoakley: 4%. >>> 2) On 4 quad-core processor tigerton: more than 30%. >>> >>> bisect located below patch. >>> >>> b4ce92775c2e7ff9cf79cca4e0a19c8c5fd6287b is first bad commit >>> commit b4ce92775c2e7ff9cf79cca4e0a19c8c5fd6287b >>> Author: Herbert Xu >>> Date: Tue Nov 13 21:33:32 2007 -0800 >>> >>> [IPV6]: Move nfheader_len into rt6_info >>> >>> The dst member nfheader_len is only used by IPv6. It's also currently >>> creating a rather ugly alignment hole in struct dst. Therefore this patch >>> moves it from there into struct rt6_info. >>> >>> >>> As tbench uses ipv4, so the patch's real impact on ipv4 is it deletes >>> nfheader_len in dst_entry. It might change cache line alignment. >>> >>> To verify my finding, I just added nfheader_len back to dst_entry in 2.6.25-rc1 >>> and reran tbench on the 2 machines. Performance could be recovered completely. >>> >>> I started cpu_number*2 tbench processes. On my 16-core tigerton: >>> #./tbench_srv & >>> #./tbench 32 127.0.0.1 >>> >>> -yanmin >>> >> Yup. struct dst is sensitive to alignements, especially for benches. >> >> In the real world, we need to make sure that next pointer start at a cache >> line bondary (or a litle bit after), so that RT cache lookups use one cache >> line per entry instead of two. This permits better behavior in DDOS attacks. >> >> (check commit 1e19e02ca0c5e33ea73a25127dbe6c3b8fcaac4b for reference) >> >> Are you using a 64 or a 32 bit kernel ? >> > 64bit x86-64 machine. On another 4-way Madison Itanium machine, tbench has the > similiar regression. > > On linux-2.6.25-rc1 x86_64 : offsetof(struct dst_entry, lastuse)=0xb0 offsetof(struct dst_entry, __refcnt)=0xb8 offsetof(struct dst_entry, __use)=0xbc offsetof(struct dst_entry, next)=0xc0 So it should be optimal... I dont know why tbench prefers __refcnt being on 0xc0, since in this case lastuse will be on a different cache line... Each incoming IP packet will need to change lastuse, __refcnt and __use, so keeping them in the same cache line is a win. I suspect then that even this patch could help tbench, since it avoids writing lastuse... diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h index e3ac7d0..24d3c4e 100644 --- a/include/net/dst.h +++ b/include/net/dst.h @@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ static inline void dst_use(struct dst_entry *dst, unsigned long time) { dst_hold(dst); dst->__use++; - dst->lastuse = time; + if (time != dst->lastuse) + dst->lastuse = time; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/