Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:03:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:03:48 -0500 Received: from pa147.antoniuk.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.25.59.147]:36849 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:03:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:02:29 +0100 From: Jacek =?iso-8859-2?Q?Pop=B3awski?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.2.20 vs 2.4.17 on 486 server Message-ID: <20020108220229.A13462@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have simple 486 server with: - 2 ISA ethernet cards (eepro.o) - ppp connection to Internet I installed 2.4.17 (then 2.4.18-pre2) there, and discovered, that two connected workstations has very bad Internet connection (for example it was impossible to watch huge www pages or download pictures, edonkey/kza transfers were small). So i tested: - WWW speed on server -> OK (every page opens without problems) - scp transfer between server and workstations -> OK (more than 100KB/s) There is squid installed on my server. But even if I used it on workstation - WWW still works bad! Looks like something was really bad with MASQ. But everything was OK on much faster (k6-2 500) system. So I installed 2.2.20 - and all problems disappeared! I am almost sure I compiled similiar stuff to every kernel, there was exactly the same ipchains rules and route. How can I check what was bad with 2.4.x ? -- decopter - free SDL/OpenGL simulator under heavy development download it from http://decopter.sourceforge.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/