Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:37:32 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jeff@garzik.org,
       davem@davemloft.net, arjan@infradead.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
Message-Id: <20080215153732.a93caec7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080215232308.GC31474@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20080212044314.GA4888@kroah.com>
	<20080211211751.3e265754@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	<20080211.221126.230471463.davem@davemloft.net>
	<47B1CB08.4020101@garzik.org>
	<alpine.LFD.1.00.0802120847500.2920@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	<20080212174824.GA1919@kroah.com>
	<alpine.LFD.1.00.0802121011280.2920@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	<20080212191552.GA20883@kroah.com>
	<alpine.LFD.1.00.0802121133210.2920@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	<20080212204813.GA21650@kroah.com>
	<20080215232308.GC31474@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1894
Lines: 40

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:23:08 +0000
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:48:13PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > I have tried, and successfully done this many times in the past.  The
> > kobject change was one example: add a new function, migrate all users of
> > a direct pointer over to that function, after that work is all done and
> > in, change the structure and do the needed work afterward.  All is
> > bisectable completly, with no big "flag day" needed.
> 
> Incorrect - because this all happened far too quickly.  This is one of
> the reasons that I ended up having to redo various parts of the ARM tree
> because stuff broke - set_kset_name() completely vanished introducing
> compile errors, and iirc some merge issues as well.
> 
> I had patches introducing new system objects which use that, and
> modifications extremely close to other uses in the PXA code.
> 
> The end result (through rebuilding the affected parts of my git tree, and
> asking people for replacement patches) was something that is bisectable -
> but had I tried to merge stuff as is, it would've been an utter mess, and
> _was_ unbuildable.
> 

I wonder why I didn't see any of this - I build arm allmodconfig at least
once a week, usually more frequently.

So either the offending patches weren't in my pile or arm allmodconfig is
worse than I thought :(

It really is in arch maintainers' best interest to keep their allmodconfig
in good shape, for this reason.  arm's _isn't_ in good shape: the compile
fails for several long-standing reasons (eg: no hope of building DRM) and I
don't think the coverage is very broad either.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/