Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:17:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:17:27 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:39944 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:17:16 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable From: Robert Love To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Andrew Morton , Anton Blanchard , Andrea Arcangeli , Luigi Genoni , Dieter N?tzel , Marcelo Tosatti , Rik van Riel , Linux Kernel List In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20020108030420Z287595-13997+1799@vger.kernel.org> <3C3B4CB7.FEAAF5FC@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.18.08.57 (Preview Release) Date: 08 Jan 2002 16:19:04 -0500 Message-Id: <1010524746.3225.112.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:18, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Instead, a decision needs to be made: "Linux will henceforth be a > > low-latency kernel". > > I thought the intention was to make it a config option? It was originally, it is now, and I intend it to be. Further, since it uses the existing SMP locks, it doesn't introduce new design decisions (the one being protection of implicitly locked per-CPU data on preempt). Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/