Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764026AbYBPANZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:13:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761252AbYBPAMt (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:12:49 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:38765 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759253AbYBPAMr (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:12:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:03:47 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , Jeff Garzik , David Miller , arjan@infradead.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) Message-ID: <20080216000347.1ea90e91@core> In-Reply-To: <47B61AD7.80902@tiscali.nl> References: <20080211203146.3d28d1a0@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080212044314.GA4888@kroah.com> <20080211211751.3e265754@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080211.221126.230471463.davem@davemloft.net> <47B1CB08.4020101@garzik.org> <20080212174824.GA1919@kroah.com> <20080212191552.GA20883@kroah.com> <47B32510.20200@tiscali.nl> <20080213180833.50019be7@core> <47B61AD7.80902@tiscali.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 979 Lines: 24 On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:05:59 +0100 Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >> Evolution in nature and changes in code are different because in code junk > >> and bugs are constantly removed. In biology junk is allowed and may provide > >> a pool for future development. Linux development is intended and not > >> survival. > > > > I would be interested to see any evidence (rather than intuition) to > > support that, given that both appear to be the same kind of structure and > > that structure is nowadays fairly well understood. > > What do you mean with structure, the evolution? that both are a language? No that they show the same mathematical structure and behaviour - both are scale free networks. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/