Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:18:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:18:37 -0500 Received: from ppp-RAS1-4-2.dialup.eol.ca ([64.56.227.2]:3333 "EHLO node0.opengeometry.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:18:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:18:19 -0500 From: William Park To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Two hdds on one channel - why so slow? Message-ID: <20020108161819.A1878@node0.opengeometry.ca> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200201041740.LAA07840@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> <200201082029.g08KTAA28497@snark.thyrsus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200201082029.g08KTAA28497@snark.thyrsus.com>; from landley@trommello.org on Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 07:41:42AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 07:41:42AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > The goal was to see how cheaply we could get to 10 terabytes of storage. We > didn't do the whole cluster, but I think we determined we only needed 4 or 5 > nodes to do it. Then the dot-com crash hit and that company's business model > changed, project got shelved... Hi Rob, how did you manage to get 10TB storage? It's my understanding that kernel block device still counts 1kB blocks using 32bit (signed) integer. So, that's 2TB in total. Are you talking about 5 x 2TB? -- William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, . 8 CPU cluster, NAS, (Slackware) Linux, Python, LaTeX, Vim, Mutt, Tin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/