Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:35:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:35:47 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:43258 "HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:35:40 -0500 To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Roger Larsson , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Robert Love , David Howells , torvalds@transmeta.com, arjanv@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] preempt abstraction In-Reply-To: Message from Daniel Phillips of "Tue, 08 Jan 2002 23:12:02 +0100." User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 22:35:21 +0000 Message-ID: <12517.1010529321@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> From: David Howells Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The choice of need_preempt() and preempt() came out of discussion with a number of people. However, I can see the points being made. I have to admit, I've not come across conditional_schedule in the main kernel, so I guess this is an Andrea specific. I think, actually, I prefer yield/need_yield or maybe yield and yield_requested as this is consistent with things like sched_yield. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/