Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:03:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:03:19 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:62216 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:03:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] preempt abstraction From: Robert Love To: David Howells Cc: Daniel Phillips , Roger Larsson , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , torvalds@transmeta.com, arjanv@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <12550.1010530018@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <12550.1010530018@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.18.08.57 (Preview Release) Date: 08 Jan 2002 18:05:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1010531114.3225.172.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 17:46, David Howells wrote: > ftp://infradead.org/pub/people/dwh/yield-252p10.diff.bz2 > > There's now a version of the patch with preempt/need_preempt changed to > yield/need_yield, and with the unlikely() claused moved into need_yield(), > should that be more to your preference. Still not the name I would pick, but better :) Oh, and need_yield is still marked unlikely in sched.c Good patch, Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/