Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:10:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:10:42 -0500 Received: from petasus.iil.intel.com ([192.198.152.69]:38869 "EHLO petasus.iil.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:10:23 -0500 Message-ID: <3C3B7C3D.1090000@intel.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 01:09:49 +0200 From: Vladimir Kondratiev Organization: Intel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nelcomp@attglobal.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: __FUNCTION__ In-Reply-To: <3C3B664B.3060103@intel.com> <3C3B6BD2.9070201@attglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian S. Nelson wrote: > I suspect this might be about as religious an issue as there is but > has anyone thought about coming up with some "standard" debugging > macros, perhaps something that can be configured at compile time from > the configuration for everyone to use everywhere? I've got my own > debug macros, essentially a printk with the file, function and line > added wrapped in #ifdef DEBUG. I've seen several other schemes in > other parts of the kernel and now some of them aren't correct. > > I guess what I would envision is some kind of debug menu item in the > configuration tool that let's you select if you want messages, and/or > filenames, and/or line numbers, and/or function names, or nothing at > all. They could still be controlled at the module level by defining > or not defining some constant. It just seems kind of pointless to > have 10-20 different macros or methods that all do the same thing for > different parts of the kernel. > Ian > I am fully agree with idea of one set of debug/info/warn/etc. macros. My main point in prev. posting was to fix __FUNCTION__, for USB this seems to be easy doable since there is already subsystem-wide dbg() and alike macros. Actually, there is no sense for __FUNCTION__ to appear outside macros; in real code it provides no added value (except easy cut-n-paste from function to function). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/