Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/30] r/o bind mounts: stub functions
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu
In-Reply-To: <20080215224608.fb5d11b7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20080215223721.9E0A088A@kernel>
	 <20080215223730.90A85F4A@kernel> <20080216003219.GA26734@mit.edu>
	 <1203122979.13230.3.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net>
	 <20080216010030.GC26734@mit.edu>
	 <20080215171119.578bd302.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	 <20080216063129.GA8592@lst.de>
	 <20080215224608.fb5d11b7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:06:43 -0800
Message-Id: <1203318403.15017.7.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 883
Lines: 21

On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 22:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> hrm, well, how about putting up a complete and suitably-changelogged patch
> series for Linus to look at?  That's be a Dave thing I guess.

I'll look at it on Wednesday.  I'm offline until then.

> I wasn't overawed by the initial patch - why not make those stubs inlined
> to truly add zero cost??

What I sent was the exact same thing I had from the original patch
series.  They weren't inlined because shortly after that in the series,
we make them much bigger.  Merging that exact patch is the easiest for
me, but I see your point.  I'll rework it  with the others.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/