Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756220AbYBRIZ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:25:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754057AbYBRIZQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:25:16 -0500 Received: from e28smtp05.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.5]:34546 "EHLO e28esmtp05.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753765AbYBRIZO (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:25:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:47 +0530 From: Dhaval Giani To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Paul Jackson , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Gregory Haskins , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] reworking load_balance_monitor Message-ID: <20080218082447.GA3823@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Dhaval Giani References: <20080214155724.772744000@chello.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080214155724.772744000@chello.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 670 Lines: 22 On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:57:24PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi, > > Here the current patches that rework load_balance_monitor. > > The main reason for doing this is to eliminate the wakeups the thing generates, > esp. on an idle system. The bonus is that it removes a kernel thread. > Hi Peter, The changes look really good to me. I will give it a run in sometime and give some more feedback. -- regards, Dhaval -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/