Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762101AbYBRWec (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:34:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760172AbYBRWeX (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:34:23 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:46586 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752569AbYBRWeW (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:34:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:34:10 +0000 From: Russell King To: Michael Buesch Cc: Gordon Farquharson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, stefano.brivio@polimi.it Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm Message-ID: <20080218223410.GD23181@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <97a0a9ac0802181403ja79c32v864b093414b2755@mail.gmail.com> <200802182308.56789.mb@bu3sch.de> <20080218221324.GB23181@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <200802182324.45267.mb@bu3sch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802182324.45267.mb@bu3sch.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1371 Lines: 31 On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:24:44PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 18 February 2008 23:13:24 Russell King wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:08:56PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > On Monday 18 February 2008 23:03:10 Gordon Farquharson wrote: > > > > The b43 driver in 2.6.25-rc[12] fails to build for arm on an x86_64 > > > > box using a cross-compiler: > > > > > > > > FATAL: drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43: sizeof(struct ssb_device_id)=6 is > > > > not a modulo of the size of section __mod_ssb_device_table=64. > > > > Fix definition of struct ssb_device_id in mod_devicetable.h > > > > > > Why does ARM have this special requirement and what is it about? > > > > Because ARM is a 32 bit architecture. > > Ehm, I didn't see this warning on any other architecture nor did we > have _any_ problem with it on any other architecture. > This code runs fine on x86_32, x86_64, powerpc and mips, at least. Well, don't expect this driver to work until you fix your broken assumptions about alignment requirements. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/