Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760417AbYBSDTV (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755253AbYBSDTN (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:13 -0500 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:1128 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755228AbYBSDTM (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:11 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@netrider.rowland.org To: Pavel Machek cc: kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list Subject: Re: Status of storage autosuspend In-Reply-To: <20080218222014.GB31201@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 22 On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Should we ignore this issue and submit the patches anyway? > > I think you should. "Easy" (and clean) solution to that issue is to > just return -EPERM from SG_IOCTL if autosuspend is configured in ;-). :-) Okay, I'll update the patches to 2.6.25-rc2 and submit them in a few days. (Actually the SCSI patch has to go in first and the usb-storage patch afterward, which will probably cause it to be delayed one kernel version. I don't know any good way to handle these cross-subsystem updates...) Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/