Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758696AbYBSGpR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:45:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754037AbYBSGpF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:45:05 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.182]:51341 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753768AbYBSGpC (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:45:02 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IjC+AGH0IfR7kWlAPGCdGea/hYKRWlJchozJgvSl0Aqlw25NZczH8lenGkywSU2/V50rMYPLanDzTRPrhZTcPeQGSLk2WsiqQcmEvgsaowYnSlyb7zTmMeW+IMB2JiYewc7qC0JdDFQOtUa7vdYSCL+33I6K/Qz8/njoLHEH4JQ= Message-ID: <64bb37e0802182244i69f161d0y34ac4cace386147c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:44:59 +0100 From: "Torsten Kaiser" To: "Linus Torvalds" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc2 Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64bb37e0802161338j306c1357m25bc224f09e6b7cd@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1587 Lines: 49 On Feb 19, 2008 12:54 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > > > [ 5282.056415] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 5282.059757] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:33! > > Is there any chance that you could try to bisect this, if it's repeatable > enough for you? Even if you can't bisect it *all* the way, it would be > really good to do a handful of bisection runs which should already > hopefully narrow it down a bit more. > > Linus > It's repeatable, but not in a really reliable way. So to mark a kernel good I need to compile around 100 KDE packages, and even then I'm not 100% sure, if it's good or if I was just lucky. But I did a partly bisect against 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.nfsd -> worked 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.xfs -> crashed I think the only added patch between rc2-mm1 and rc3-mm2 in that range where the iommu changes that I later ruled out. That leaves some git trees as suspects: git-ocfs2.patch git-selinux.patch git-s390.patch git-sched.patch git-sh.patch git-scsi-misc.patch git-unionfs.patch git-v9fs.patch git-watchdog.patch git-wireless.patch git-ipwireless_cs.patch git-x86.patch git-xfs.patch (see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120276641105256 ) Torsten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/