Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763580AbYBSLYw (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:24:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762294AbYBSLXn (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:23:43 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40703 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762212AbYBSLXm (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:23:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:23:22 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] AMD opteron mm config numa etc Message-ID: <20080219112322.GD7204@elte.hu> References: <200802190319.28699.yinghai.lu@sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802190319.28699.yinghai.lu@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 670 Lines: 18 * Yinghai Lu wrote: > please check some amd opteron related mmconf and numa patches > > could make up for system that system have acpi problem or still can > mmconf and numa when acpi=off Greg, any deep objections against these patches? (other than that they need a good amount of testing) I personally think that the more independent the kernel is of the whims of the BIOS, the better ... Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/