Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 03:28:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 03:28:28 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:36529 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 03:28:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:25:43 +0100 (CET) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: To: Mike Kravetz Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , george anzinger , Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17 In-Reply-To: <20020108193904.A1068@w-mikek2.beaverton.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Kravetz wrote: > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput. > Higher is better. very interesting numbers, nice work Mike! I'd suggest the following additional test: please also run tests like VolanoMark with 'nice -n 19'. The O(1) scheduler's task-penalty method works in our favor in this case, since we know the test is CPU-bound we can move all processes to nice level 19. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/