Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754984AbYBSQMT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:12:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752798AbYBSQML (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:12:11 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:57561 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752778AbYBSQMK (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:12:10 -0500 Message-ID: <47BAFFD3.1070606@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:12:03 -0800 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel Gorman CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, Christoph Lameter , Jack Steiner Subject: Re: 2.6.24 git2/mm1: cpu_to_node mapping to non-existant nodes causing boot failure References: <20080203171634.58ab668b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080213175241.GA327@csn.ul.ie> <47B33ACF.5030700@sgi.com> <20080214201727.GC30841@csn.ul.ie> <47B4A774.7050509@sgi.com> <20080215020208.GA6500@csn.ul.ie> <47B77E90.5050809@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <47B77E90.5050809@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 34 Mike Travis wrote: > Mel Gorman wrote: > >> If you send me patches to apply on top of 2.6.25-rc1, I'll give them a spin >> on the machine in question. Reverting didn't work out very well as there are >> too many collisions with patches that were applied later. I eventually got >> the machine booting but it only succeeds because it only brings up one core >> on each processor. The patch, which is pretty brain damaged is below in case >> it helps you guess what the real problem is. dmesg logs are attached of the >> vanilla failure with acpi=debug and the log with the patch applied showing >> "__cpu_up: bad cpu 1" and "__cpu_up: bad cpu3" (i.e. the second cores of >> each machine). >> > > This should completely undo the change to 16 bit apic ids until we can figure > out the problem with the memory-less nodes. I checked it on both the numa > and non-numa x86_64 box. > > Thanks, > Mike > Hi Mel, Did you get a chance to try out this patch to see if it cleared up the problem booting on your x86_64 numa box? Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/