Message-ID: <47BB12FA.5050604@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:33:46 -0800
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc
References: <47B4C5E7.5000802@ct.jp.nec.com> <20080214164216.45ebf51f@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080215011341.GA11756@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20080215011341.GA11756@elte.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1122
Lines: 38

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
>> Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
>>>
>>> But, I think this patch is better than old ones.
> 
> thanks Hiroshi, applied.

Hi Ingo,

I'd like to be applied new patch for latencytop fix.
I think it better than old ptaches.

Can you apply this patch for latencytop issues?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/451

It's replacement of old patches you applied.
It makes latency file behavior same as other proc files.
get_proc_task() and put_task_struct() are called at read time,
and returns -ESRCH if get_proc_task() failed.

If is there any problem, please let me know.

thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/