Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760766AbYBSVDW (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:03:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752440AbYBSVDM (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:03:12 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:37943 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754167AbYBSVDL (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:03:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=GXrBOm+ZJCkB5VIUuWtkwdBklyAIyHXXBBe5HirEvaLr9GwtbNsECQmEIbR7L7uf0QgsbSVW8pKmuOU2h07/jgyW10+tspFg4McB+/faWkt4tEJFAxNduHejh3rCDI9+yeMh+HS6q7oh94ufrAktwC2EUh71PsoZSs8jUBn7rNE= To: chris2553@googlemail.com Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:03:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200802192046.14184.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200802192044.52327.chris2553@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <200802192044.52327.chris2553@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802192203.03741.IvDoorn@gmail.com> From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1358 Lines: 32 Hi, > > > I've tried the patch but, unfortunately, my wireless LAN still dies after a few pings. > > > > Could you use below patch instead, and make a new dump of the register? > > I'm still convinced the breakage occurs in the antenna diversity (or rather, I believe > > it attempts a software diversity for your card while in fact it shouldn't). > > > > Sorry, I've applied that patch and the LAN still dies after a few pings. BTW, > this and the earlier patch both apply without error, but give warnings of 70 > line offsets. Were you expecting them to apply completely cleanly? I'm just > wondering if there might be some code that you are expecting to be running (or > not running) that is (or is not) present in the driver at 2.6.25-rc2. Well to be honest I based the patch on rt2x00.git and not 2.6.25-rc2. I know the patch would apply safely because the function that were changed in that patch haven't changed between them. But some other functions were moved. So that offset is correct. ;) > The register dumps before and after are attached. Thanks. I hope to have a new patch ready soon. Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/