Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762319AbYBSWG7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:06:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754608AbYBSWGs (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:06:48 -0500 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:61154 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753939AbYBSWGr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:06:47 -0500 Message-ID: <47BB52B9.5020702@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:05:45 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Petazzoni CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, michael@free-electrons.com Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (x64 thermal build failure) References: <20080216002522.9c4bd0fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080216211603.bb4f3582.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080216214410.b9699910.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080218111536.511c4fbc@crazy> <20080218041340.f1e46ec9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080219165502.2c202759@crazy> <20080219094147.b9e0e99b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080219230016.5b7ff43d@crazy> In-Reply-To: <20080219230016.5b7ff43d@crazy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 997 Lines: 34 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:41:47 -0800, > Randy Dunlap a ?crit : > >> Does this patch apply to -mm? Seem like No. > > No, it was generated against 2.6.25-rc2. > >> After converting it from mime(?) to ASCII > > Probably due to my PGP-MIME signature. Will try to remember that > I should disable it next time. > >> and fixing one #if (change "and" to "&&") > > Oops. Fixed on my side too. > >> & fixing patch rejects, it does build cleanly. > > The rejects are probably due to the patch being applied to -mm. It > applies fine on -rc here. > > Any opinion about whether the patch is clean ? Worth it ? It seems reasonable to me as long as the option depends on EMBEDDED, as it does. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/