Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 04:45:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 04:44:52 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-044.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.44]:54285 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 04:44:49 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:48:03 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Anton Blanchard , Andrea Arcangeli , Luigi Genoni , Dieter N?tzel , Marcelo Tosatti , Rik van Riel , Linux Kernel List , Robert Love In-Reply-To: <20020108030420Z287595-13997+1799@vger.kernel.org> <3C3C0CB1.16A7CC5B@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3C3C0CB1.16A7CC5B@zip.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 9, 2002 10:26 am, Andrew Morton wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > By the way, did you check for latency in directory operations? > > Yes. They can be very bad for really large directories. Scheduling > on the found-in-cache case in bread() kills that one easily for most > local filesystems. There may still be a problem in ext2. A indexed directory won't have that problem - I'll get to finishing off the htree patch pretty soon[1]. In any event, the analogous technique will work: a schedule point in ext2_bread. [1] Wli's hash work is happening at a convenient time. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/