MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] signal(x86_32): Improve the signal stack overflow
	check
In-Reply-To: Paul Mackerras's message of  Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:21:51 +1100 <18363.25743.402510.695150@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
References: <47B95C4D.6080000@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<47BA3CAB.30905@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20080219110536.GA2683@elte.hu>
	<18363.25743.402510.695150@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20080220000430.684DC2700F5@magilla.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 449
Lines: 13

> These patches change the behaviour of programs that longjmp out of a
> signal handler on an alternate stack, don't they?

No, they don't.  Shi Weihua's original patch had that problem.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/