Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759053AbYBTGiX (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:38:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754642AbYBTGiO (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:38:14 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:42329 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734AbYBTGiN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:38:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:37:52 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Greg KH Cc: Yinghai Lu , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] AMD opteron mm config numa etc Message-ID: <20080220063752.GD7493@elte.hu> References: <200802190319.28699.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <20080219112322.GD7204@elte.hu> <20080219175339.GB8344@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080219175339.GB8344@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1511 Lines: 34 * Greg KH wrote: > > > could make up for system that system have acpi problem or still > > > can mmconf and numa when acpi=off > > > > Greg, any deep objections against these patches? (other than that > > they need a good amount of testing) I personally think that the more > > independent the kernel is of the whims of the BIOS, the better ... > > No objection from me, other than they need a LOT of testing. [...] ok - have queued it up for v2.6.26. Note: Andrew might get grumpy when your PCI tree starts changing nearby places in arch/x86/pci again and it clashes with these changes in x86.git - in that case please pick up the full lot from x86.git#testing and carry it in the PCI tree. (or, alternatively, send me any trivial, arch/x86-only PCI bits to x86.git#testing so that we can keep it and test it all in a single place - whichever approach is more convenient to you) > [...] Oh, and the networking patch is still wrong, and the poster has > been told this numerous times, which makes me wonder how well the pci > bridge patch was tested... i think the optimization should be more correct now than in the past, its purpose and dependencies just have not been communicated fully. We'll get there eventually :-) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/