Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763281AbYBTKk3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:40:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754044AbYBTKjt (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:39:49 -0500 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:4216 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753070AbYBTKjq (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:39:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:39:43 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: "Johann Felix v. Soden-Fr." Cc: Patrick McManus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice: fix problem with sys_tee and SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK Message-ID: <20080220103941.GW23197@kernel.dk> References: <1203452091.7758.5.camel@localhost> <20080219202543.GK23197@kernel.dk> <1203455538.7758.17.camel@localhost> <20080219212530.GN23197@kernel.dk> <1203457661.7758.31.camel@localhost> <20080220093528.GU23197@kernel.dk> <20080220100726.GA18161@LAPJFS> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080220100726.GA18161@LAPJFS> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3309 Lines: 87 On Wed, Feb 20 2008, Johann Felix v. Soden-Fr. wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19 2008, Johann Felix Soden wrote: > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 22:25 +0100 schrieb Jens Axboe: > > > > On Tue, Feb 19 2008, Johann Felix Soden wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19 2008, Johann Felix Soden wrote: > > > > > > > From: Johann Felix Soden > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK sys_tee should return number of duplicated bytes, > > > > > > > not only -EAGAIN on success. > > > > > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > The current behaviour is to return bytes tee'd, or return -EAGAIN for > > > > > > zero bytes if SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK is set. It doesn't return "-EAGAIN on > > > > > > success", not sure what you mean there. > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, my patch description was not correct. > > > > > > > > > > The new behavior of sys_tee with my patch is: > > > > > - return -EAGAIN if there are no data in the pipe, but writer > > > > > connected to the pipe, > > > > > - return 0 if there are not writers connected > > > > > - else return number of duplicated byte > > > > > > > > > > The old behavior was: return -EAGAIN or the number (>0) of duplicated > > > > > bytes. > > > > > > > > Your patch has an odd way of achieving that goal, modify the real > > > > location of the assignment instead of overriding something. That has the > > > > potential to turn into another confusing bug later on, wondering why the > > > > heck your return value isn't being passed back. > > > > > > > > Improvement is welcome though, you can't distuingish -EAGAIN on the > > > > input side from the output side currently. > > > > > > When non-blocking is set, ideally we want to return 0 if there's no hope > > of anymore data and EAGAIN if trying later may yield some data. So how > > about this instead? > > > > diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c > > index 9b559ee..0670c91 100644 > > --- a/fs/splice.c > > +++ b/fs/splice.c > > @@ -1669,6 +1669,13 @@ static int link_pipe(struct pipe_inode_info *ipipe, > > i++; > > } while (len); > > > > + /* > > + * return EAGAIN if we have the potential of some data in the > > + * future, otherwise just return 0 > > + */ > > + if (!ret && ipipe->waiting_writers && (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK)) > > + ret = -EAGAIN; > > + > > inode_double_unlock(ipipe->inode, opipe->inode); > > > > /* > > @@ -1709,11 +1716,8 @@ static long do_tee(struct file *in, struct file *out, size_t len, > > ret = link_ipipe_prep(ipipe, flags); > > if (!ret) { > > ret = link_opipe_prep(opipe, flags); > > - if (!ret) { > > + if (!ret) > > ret = link_pipe(ipipe, opipe, len, flags); > > - if (!ret && (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK)) > > - ret = -EAGAIN; > > - } > > } > > } > > > > Thanks! This works great. > Add if you want: Tested-by: Johann Felix Soden Thanks for testing that it works as expected, I'll commit and add your tested-by. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/