Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:08:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:08:31 -0500 Received: from dial249.pm3abing3.abingdonpm.naxs.com ([216.98.75.249]:54922 "EHLO ani.animx.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:08:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:17:13 -0500 From: Wakko Warner To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Over usage of memory on 2.4.16 Message-ID: <20020109071713.A30562@animx.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I used to use 2.2.19 before going to 2.4.16 and I normally noticed I had about 120mb of memory actually used and about 2-3mb in swap after weeks of uptime. This is what 2.4.16 looks like: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 514248 487444 26804 0 35172 204360 -/+ buffers/cache: 247912 266336 Swap: 131048 44724 86324 Why is 2.4.16 using this much memory after only 5 days uptime? I never saw this much with 2.2.19 after 3 weeks of uptime. I'm not running anything different than I normally do. a few xterms, X 3.3.6, netscape 4.77, star office 5.2, and a bunch of daemons. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/