Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764154AbYBTOXw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:23:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761836AbYBTOXm (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:23:42 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:51387 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753105AbYBTOXl (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:23:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:23:32 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: first tree Message-Id: <20080221012332.dc1948ac.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20080214160231.GC10713@shadowen.org> References: <20080215003537.8911ce35.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080214160231.GC10713@shadowen.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2008_01_23_32_+1100_IavXq2RlDjLH4u_H" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1810 Lines: 48 --Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2008_01_23_32_+1100_IavXq2RlDjLH4u_H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andy, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 +0000 Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next > tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree its not obvious how > I would communicate which tree I had tested. I guess we could use the > SHA1 of the actual head used, but that really is cumbersome for the poor > people who have to check the results and actually report things to lkml. I hope I have addressed this issue by tagging each tree with its date i.e. todays was next-20080220. > Also will you be producing any tarballs for these releases? If so I > would say they would definatly need to be against some common base, like > against the nearest official tag "below". I hadn't considered tarballs, but I will give it some thought. Thanks for your thoughts. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2008_01_23_32_+1100_IavXq2RlDjLH4u_H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHvDfsTgG2atn1QN8RAgv6AJ4ndn+rmQtfVmf2xAmDq7SGI9qW5QCdH9d4 JSQ5BUhogQ0ifR3raX3lQUw= =sXDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2008_01_23_32_+1100_IavXq2RlDjLH4u_H-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/