Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:53:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:53:09 -0500 Received: from [212.169.100.200] ([212.169.100.200]:19960 "EHLO sexything.nextframe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:52:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 14:52:24 +0100 From: Morten Helgesen To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: axboe@suse.de, dougg@torque.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/psi240i.c - io_request_lock fix Message-ID: <20020109145224.B7291@sexything> Reply-To: admin@nextframe.net In-Reply-To: <200201091328.FAA07632@adam.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200201091328.FAA07632@adam.yggdrasil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.0 X-Keyboard: PFU Happy Hacking Keyboard X-Operating-System: Slackware Linux (of course) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:28:00AM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote: > >> = Morten Helgesen > > = Douglas Gilbert > > >From the look of this line in the patch: > >> + struct Scsi_Host *host = PsiHost[irq - 10]; > > > >It will work if the first controller is allocated irq 10, > >the second one irq 11, etc. Unlikely ... > > No, I think Morten has the use of PsiHost right. The > entries in PsiHost are apparently stored by IRQ. It is not generally > the case that the first controller is at PsiHost[0], the second at > PsiHost[1], etc. Even though I am not _that_ familiar with the code in question, that is how I understood it too. > > I agree with Jens in that the practice is rather ugly, but that > is the way the driver worked before io_request_lock disappeared and > I think that improving that stylistic issue is not a prerequisite > for conversion from io_request_lock to host->host_lock. Ugly it is. It was not my intention to clean up the code, just make the smallest change necessary to get it to work. The maintainer should probably do a closer examination. > > If I were you, Morten, I would go ahead with your patch > that makes the minimal changes and then, if you want, make stylistic > improvements as one or more separate patches, which are something > that you may want to talk over with the mainter of that driver, if > there currently is one. Sure - but who is the maintainer ? :) > > Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104 > adam@yggdrasil.com \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034 > +1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America > fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us." > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- "Det er ikke lett ? v?re menneske" - sitat fra en klok person. mvh Morten Helgesen UNIX System Administrator & C Developer Nextframe AS admin@nextframe.net / 93445641 http://www.nextframe.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/