Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:03:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:03:39 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:61450 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:03:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:03:15 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Cc: Mark Hahn , Subject: Re: [BUG] Error reading multiple large files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > > you really should try akpm's "[patch, CFT] improved disk read latency" > > patch. it sounds almost perfect for your application. > It seemed like it helped first, but after a while, some 99 processes > went Defunct, and locked. After this, the total 'bi' as reported from > vmstat went down to ~ 900kB per sec > > What should I do? I've done a little bit of low memory testing with my -rmap VM patch, the system seems to be working just fine with 8MB of RAM ... If you have the time, could you try the following patch ? http://surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.17-rmap-11a regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/