Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:04:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:04:33 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-044.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.44]:53252 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:04:14 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:07:40 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Robert Love , Anton Blanchard , Luigi Genoni , Dieter N?tzel , Marcelo Tosatti , Rik van Riel , Linux Kernel List , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20020108030420Z287595-13997+1799@vger.kernel.org> <20020109145509.G1543@inspiron.school.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20020109145509.G1543@inspiron.school.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 9, 2002 02:55 pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:56:50PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > BTW, I find your main argument confusing. First you don't want -preempt with > > CONFIG_EXERIMENTAL because it might not get wide enough testing, so you want > > to enable it by default in the mainline kernel, then you argue it's too risky > > because everybody will use it and it might break some obscure driver. Sorry, > > you lost me back there. > > the point I am making is very simple: _if_ we include it, it should _not_ > be a config option. That doesn't make any sense to me. Why should _SMP be a config option and not _PREEMPT? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/