Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932129AbYBTRPl (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:15:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751596AbYBTRPP (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:15:15 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:43168 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752155AbYBTRPN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:15:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:15:12 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Andrew Buehler cc: Oliver Pinter , Kernel development list , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , SCSI development list , USB list Subject: Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]* - mostly resolved In-Reply-To: <47BC5E01.1050902@gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1792 Lines: 43 On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: > > What do you mean by "does not see the drive"? > > Its detect-hardware-and-report mode shows a HD size of 0 (which is what > it has showed in cases where the kernel has not detected the drive), its > detect-partitions-and-report mode shows no partitions and no devices > which can have partitions, and attempting to actually use it to pull > down a drive image (it's a disk-imaging program) causes it to hang at > the point where it would begin to write. > > Hmm. One thing which just sprang to mind, in the stab-in-the-dark > category: in 2.6.24.2, launching the program on some machines gave > warnings along the lines of "this program is using a deprecated ioctl, > please convert it to SG_IO" (which I naturally cannot do since it's > closed and I don't have the source), You can ask the program's author to update it. > but IIRC in the 2.5.25-rc2-based > disc with ACPI enabled no such message appears. If the reason that there > are no longer such messages is that the ioctl in question has now been > removed, that might explain why the program does not see the drive. Could be. You can use strace to find out what system calls the program is making. > I'm not sure I expressed myself clearly. I do not think the problem is > with the different kernels. I think the problem is with the different > configurations. I am asking if there are any established techniques for > comparing differences between config files from widely different > kernels. Not as far as I know. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/