Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762920AbYBUAtD (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:49:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757909AbYBUAsu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:48:50 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40820 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753731AbYBUAsr (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:48:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:46:32 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Matthew Garrett , Jesse Barnes , Linus Torvalds , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jeff Chua , lkml , Dave Airlie , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, suspend-devel List Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off after suspend-to-disk. Screen becomes green. Message-ID: <20080221004632.GA25869@suse.de> References: <200802201241.30952.jesse.barnes@intel.com> <200802201344.11643.jesse.barnes@intel.com> <47BCAD6E.9080704@nigel.suspend2.net> <20080221001357.GA29796@srcf.ucam.org> <47BCC866.9000102@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47BCC866.9000102@nigel.suspend2.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1472 Lines: 32 On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:40:06AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>> - people keep talking about hibernating to an ext3 fs mounted on fuse as >>> a limitation of the freezer. To do that with kexec, you're still going to >>> have to bmap the ext3 fs and pass the block list (in which case we can >>> also do it without kexec) or umount all the ext3/fuse part and remount in >>> the kexec'd kernel. Sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't it? >> No, with a freezer-based model you can basically *never* suspend to >> anything related to FUSE or a userspace USB device or anything involving >> userspace iSCSI initiators or whatever. Sure, there are cases where moving >> away from the current model doesn't buy you anything, but that doesn't >> mean that the current model is a good thing. It's not. The freezer is a >> fundamentally broken concept. > > Putting drivers and filesystems in userspace is the fundamentally broken > concept. Not just when it comes to the freezer. The whole idea is > inherently racy. Racy with regards to other things becides trying to suspend a machine? If so, what? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/