Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763221AbYBUKzv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:55:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758084AbYBUKzn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:55:43 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:39219 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754306AbYBUKzm (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:55:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=jEWZ7ZLjMB8+T5k8R6PfOYZmSv8BYJwVlfx7RJ1zzuxUVTLXL1dyy3iO0SC1GLkS+cFE2y7y0ggfGUWtnOpIjzF8TlybiSmhM4xb4YeUSpAZtkRSTHGggmfB5fZ61Or06+z7hcXfiI6ZTfffDyFKuRiOAEKVKA2jYojg85HS2PE= Message-ID: <2f11576a0802210255k1e3acad7n87814e916fd24509@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:55:39 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" To: "minchan Kim" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] the proposal of improve page reclaim by throttle Cc: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" , "Balbir Singh" , "Rik van Riel" , "Lee Schermerhorn" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44c63dc40802210138s100e921ekde01b30bae13beb1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080220181447.6444.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <44c63dc40802200149r6b03d970g2fbde74b85ad5443@mail.gmail.com> <20080220185648.6447.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <44c63dc40802210138s100e921ekde01b30bae13beb1@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b419cd64eb479048 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 941 Lines: 26 Hi Kim-san, Thank you very much. btw, what different between and ? > It was a very interesting result. > In embedded system, your patch improve performance a little in case > without noswap(normal case in embedded system). > But, more important thing is OOM occured when I made 240 process > without swap device and vanilla kernel. > Then, I applied your patch, it worked very well without OOM. Wow, it is very interesting result! I am very happy. > I think that's why zone's page_scanned was six times greater than > number of lru pages. > At result, OOM happened. please repost question with change subject. i don't know reason of vanilla kernel behavior, sorry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/