Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933284AbYBUQQj (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:16:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759522AbYBUQQa (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:16:30 -0500 Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.201]:41094 "EHLO smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756984AbYBUQQ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:16:29 -0500 Message-ID: <47BDA46A.8050306@keyaccess.nl> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:18:50 +0100 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Helgaas CC: Adrian Bunk , ambx1@neo.rr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pnp_bus_resume(): inconsequent NULL checking References: <20080219224908.GM31955@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <200802200959.21814.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <47BD1069.1060109@keyaccess.nl> <200802210826.53731.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200802210826.53731.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 627 Lines: 16 On 21-02-08 16:26, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I'll push it upstream, but a coverity warning seems like a marginal > excuse for putting it in 2.6.25. Is there any real reason it can't > wait until 2.6.26? No, but we're only at -rc2. Dumb little things such as this needn't wait an entire development cycle I'd feel but I obviously don't feel strongly about the issue itself. Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/