Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761338AbYBUTex (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:34:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753674AbYBUTem (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:34:42 -0500 Received: from hawking.rebel.net.au ([203.20.69.83]:36679 "EHLO hawking.rebel.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758471AbYBUTel (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:34:41 -0500 Message-ID: <47BDD26D.5010004@davidnewall.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:05:09 +1030 From: David Newall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Greg KH , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Handshaking on USB serial devices References: <47B30291.2040905@davidnewall.com> <20080214050211.GB1432@kroah.com> <47B40918.20206@davidnewall.com> <20080214121026.16a9c510@core> <47B482B4.9010208@davidnewall.com> <20080214193637.5df1c205@core> <47BD9721.70907@davidnewall.com> <20080221151549.0fa72422@core> In-Reply-To: <20080221151549.0fa72422@core> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1323 Lines: 27 Alan Cox wrote: >> developing is entirely wrong. Oh well. Mind you, providing a >> write_room function is NOT a real solution; it merely reduces the >> condition to a usually-winnable race. (Ironically, when I back-ported >> the 2.6 driver, I excluded its new write_room function. Mistake.) >> > > What race do you see left ? > On second thoughts I'm not sure that I do. I've had my head so full of 2.4 pl2303, and 2.4 pl2303 with this, that and the other added to it, that I was probably just confused. Certainly it's not important, because I didn't mean the 2.6 driver, but an hypothetical 2.4 with a simplistic write_room function added (e.g. return port->write_urb->status == -EINPROGRESS ? 0 : 64). OPOST processing's use of putchar to expand CRLF sends two writes (or putchars), with no intervening checks. Since I'm just polishing off my back-port of 2.6.24.1 pl2303 to kernel 2.4, the matter is quite irrelevant. By the way, what happened to HUawei E620 UMTS/HSDPA card? It's in pl2303 in 2.6.23; not in 2.6.24.1. (Do I remove it from my back-port?) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/