Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934912AbYBUV1b (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:27:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755658AbYBUV1U (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:27:20 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:52823 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755002AbYBUV1T (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:27:19 -0500 Message-ID: <47BDEB57.5040203@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:21:27 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: Ian Campbell , Joel Becker , Jody Belka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andi Kleen , Mika Penttila Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc1 xen pvops regression References: <20080212235404.GY7980@pimb.org> <47B2DBA5.6030001@goop.org> <20080214022744.GA4160@mail.oracle.com> <47B3F2DC.8080707@goop.org> <20080215202336.GE26034@mail.oracle.com> <1203274161.27987.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080218104025.GA15899@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <1203458366.26910.15.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47BBDA20.8030105@zytor.com> <1203497511.26910.39.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47BCA275.7000504@goop.org> <1203546597.26910.74.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47BDEA11.6010302@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <47BDEA11.6010302@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2014 Lines: 46 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Ian Campbell wrote: >> I'll see if I can track down where the page is getting used and have a >> go at getting in there first. It must be pretty early to be allocated >> already when dmi_scan_machine gets called. >> >> It's possible that the domain builder might have already allocated a PT >> at this address. I haven't checked but I think currently the domain >> builder always puts PT pages after the kernel so hopefully it's only a >> theoretical problem. >> > > Yes, it does. And presumably the early pagetable builder is guaranteed > to avoid special memory like the DMI space. But the bug definitely > seems to be a result of the DMI code trying to make a RW mapping of a > pagetable page, so something is amiss there. > > Ooh, sleazy hack idea: make DMI always map RO, so even if it does get a > pagetable it causes no complaint... A bit awkward, since there doesn't > seem to be an RO form of early_ioremap. > >> Another option I was thinking of was a command line option to disable >> DMI, which (maybe) isn't terribly useful in itself but it introduces an >> associated variable to frob with. That's similar to how the TSC was >> handled in the past (well, the opposite since TSC was forced on). >> > > Yep, that would work too. > > Still curious about why a pagetable page is ending up in that range > though. Seems like it shouldn't be possible, since we shouldn't be > allowed to allocate from those pages, at least until the DMI probe has > happened... Unless the early allocator is only excluded from e820 > reserved pages, which would cause a problem on systems which don't > reserve the DMI space... HPA? > I thought the problem was a Xen-provided pagetable from before Linux started? -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/