Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764884AbYBVJkX (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:40:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752894AbYBVJkJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:40:09 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:54238 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752387AbYBVJkH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:40:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:28:55 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Ian Campbell Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Joel Becker , Jody Belka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andi Kleen , Mika Penttila Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc1 xen pvops regression Message-ID: <20080222092855.6ace8845@core> In-Reply-To: <1203665106.28436.19.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> References: <20080212235404.GY7980@pimb.org> <47B2DBA5.6030001@goop.org> <20080214022744.GA4160@mail.oracle.com> <47B3F2DC.8080707@goop.org> <20080215202336.GE26034@mail.oracle.com> <1203274161.27987.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080218104025.GA15899@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <1203458366.26910.15.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47BBDA20.8030105@zytor.com> <1203497511.26910.39.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47BCA275.7000504@goop.org> <1203546597.26910.74.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47BDEA11.6010302@goop.org> <47BDEB57.5040203@zytor.com> <47BDEF36.8000903@goop.org> <1203631956.28436.4.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47BDF9C7.6040400@zytor.com> <47BE0017.1020205@goop.org> <47BE0228.7020204@zytor.com> <1203665106.28436.19.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 816 Lines: 17 > I'd been meaning to ask this. So the machines you have which don't > describe 0xf0000 as reserved also don't describe it as RAM? (I guess > it's either a hole in the table or one of the other e820 types). Making 0xf0000 bus addresses RAM is probably a bad idea anyway. Most OS's treat the E820 map with paranoia because we do see real PCs which variously claim that the BIOS ROM space is RAM, ACPI, Reserved or just forget to mention it. At least for a non PV guest it should be mapped as R/O. Likewise you get E820 maps with zero size entries, repeated entries ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/