Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764199AbYBVUO2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:14:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757106AbYBVUOH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:14:07 -0500 Received: from vs166246.vserver.de ([62.75.166.246]:60336 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756302AbYBVUOF (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:14:05 -0500 From: Michael Buesch To: "Alexey Zaytsev" Subject: Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:12:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: "Alexey Zaytsev" , "Greg KH" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <47BEAF3B.3080809@protei.ru> <200802221848.37902.mb@bu3sch.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802222112.44317.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1526 Lines: 31 On Friday 22 February 2008 21:06:00 Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > It is not my problem, if you refuse to use b43. > > You also still refuse to tell me details about your card and _what_ > > does not work. I do own lots of different card and they > > all work fine with b43. There's one exception, the 4311 rev 3 (or something, > > don't quite remember). But patches are available and will ship in 2.6.25. > > bcm43xx won't get removed until that shipped. > > Yes, it's a 4311 rev 01, but I'm probably was just too lame to upgrade the > firmware or something. :E > > I really don't get it, what is going on here? You state that the new b32 driver > has problems on some hardware, where the old bcm43xx driver just works. > And at the same time, you are surprised that I "refuse" to use the b43 driver > and push patches for the bcm43xx driver you broke... Oh, really, why?! So, please find someone who will sign-off your patch. I won't. What's so hard to understand about that? Do I _have_ to sign off all patches random people send to me? I do _not_ want to be made responsible for that patch by signing it off. It is as simple as that. And I officially do not care about bcm43xx since a year and a half anymore. So why should I ACK it or sign it off? -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/