Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759066AbYBWBJM (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:09:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751993AbYBWBI5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:08:57 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60116 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750857AbYBWBI4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:08:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:08:16 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Dave Jones , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, arjan@infradead.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] patch kbuild-allow-fstack-protector-to-take-effect.patch added to 2.6.24-stable tree Message-ID: <20080223010816.GA4754@suse.de> References: <200802190005.m1J05SKP017015@hera.kernel.org> <20080222230103.CC4EF14540D0@imap.suse.de> <20080222230604.GA20829@redhat.com> <20080222231808.GA30669@kroah.com> <20080222233407.GB20829@redhat.com> <20080222234216.GA25809@kroah.com> <20080222235914.GC20829@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080222235914.GC20829@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 31 On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:59:14PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:42:16PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > I thought that thread was for the much larger patches, not just this > > > > Makefile change. > > > > > > At the least we'll likely want to also pick up the other stack protector fixes > > > that went into .25rc if we turn it on in .24 > > > > Hm, that sounds like a new feature :) > > > > I thought the makefile change was just a bugfix in the broken makefile. > > Well, it is. But it'll cause it to enable something that has been broken for a while. > FWIW, I think having the stack protector reenabled in -stable is a worthwhile goal, > but only once it's stabilised for a while in the development tree. > > My fear by just reenabling this for -stable is that when distros push out updates > based on the latest -stable, we'll see more systems like James' problematic system. Fair enough, between this worry, and Arjan saying "no way", I've now dropped it :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/